InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

In0nS

11/22/10 9:06 PM

#23979 RE: ergodoc #23977

THJC's opinion is sadly (for the sake of JUSTICE) flawed...

1. He uses the term "no rational basis" to conclude that the Debtor's valuation is flawed, also states that Exhibit F "could be relied upon to calculate distributions" ... NEVER MIND the $1,000,000,000 math error...

2. His ruling did not address ALL S/H objections (e.g. 503(c), Rule 2015.3, etc.) and conveiniently cherry picked to his pleasure...an AFFRONT to the rule of law and the judicial process...