THJC's opinion is sadly (for the sake of JUSTICE) flawed...
1. He uses the term "no rational basis" to conclude that the Debtor's valuation is flawed, also states that Exhibit F "could be relied upon to calculate distributions" ... NEVER MIND the $1,000,000,000 math error...
2. His ruling did not address ALL S/H objections (e.g. 503(c), Rule 2015.3, etc.) and conveiniently cherry picked to his pleasure...an AFFRONT to the rule of law and the judicial process...