First, if this was all a play for the CEO to be able to buy up shares, then he is a criminal. Second, all this talk about those who can now spend $100 and make out down the road is completely dismissive of all of us who spent a lot more and got SCREWED. Unfortunately, no one has stepped up to pursue legal action against Davenport. I admit that I am unable to do it. But, if someone out there has the time and resources, you could be a hero. The only way that those of us who owned a large amount of shares before the split can somehow get out of this without completely losing our whole investment, is if there is a forward split at some point. Otherwise, the stock could go to $100 a share tomorrow and most of us would barely break even. Where is Davenport? What is he doing? He is the president of a publicly traded corporation who SCREWED its shareholders. He has a fiduciary duty to us, which he absolutely violated. Please do not say "those are the risks with a pink." I am so tired of that sort of thinking. The risk with a pink is that the company and/or the technology is risky for legitimate reasons. Just because a pink is a pink does not mean anything goes. Pinks are not the wild west where anything goes. The CEO of a pink has a duty to its shareholders just like any other CEO of a larger corporation.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
