imho it will be proven circumstantially, quality sophisticated judges enjoy ruling on circumstantial evidence more than anything because unlike people, circumstances, that is facts relating to actions do not lie, the old addage imho "actions speak louder than words" will ring true
Actually, the fact that TM and Calypso are currently working out a deal should be "proof" that had the company not been blocked from negotiating earlier they would have been able to hold up their end of the bargain.
Why would the November 15th court date get moved if the change of venue is denied. That does not make any sense. The state case (if lost) does not award Drago the patents. CLYW is taking him to court to try and remove him from the company, he is not taking CLYW to court to claim ownership of the patents. Worst case is we have to continue to put up with him from now on and pay him money he has not earnd.
I have read most of your post and at times they are quite entertaining but in reality I have to agree with most on here that you are in too deep and are trying to get the price down to help eliminate bad judgement on your part for selling too soon. It is obvious you are interested in CLYW and think it will eventually make money or you would not waist your time keeping up with what is going on. Keep trying to get the price down and maybe more people will buy more shares who knows? Good Luck.
I know it is not much but I do like seeing the green at the top of the page.
"he is not taking CLYW to court to claim ownership of the patents. Worst case is we have to continue to put up with him from now on and pay him money he has not earnd."
I always thought it was us taking Diac to court. If we loose we simply get 75% of patents.
carter, since you saved all of us here on this board, your work is now done. Go away and stay away because I do not need you to save me anymore. I have three graduate degrees and I think I am smart enough to figure most of this out for myself. But thank you anyway.