I must agree with Dr Bob. The recent activities, appointment of the EC, the announcement by the EC, and the increase in stock activity have spawned a great deal of activity on the board, both pro CPRKQ and anti CPRKQ.
There is a problem when the anti's start talking with each other. It adds credibility to absurd logic and often false statements. Many of these anti's are probably paid bloggers, as might be some of the pro CPRKQ posters. So it is important to answer false and absurd statements with truth to break the illusions posters can create when agreeing with each other.
I agree that Chuck is most valuable as chairman of the EC and not as "bearer of truth on IHUB". I would ask that others step up and take on false and misleading posts as we discover them.