InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

zabone

11/05/10 10:32 AM

#38689 RE: conagra #38687

Carter,

You are so full of crap. You do not know anything about how the talks are going with daic or TM unless you are in the room when these discussions are going on. If you are an insider and involved in these discussions, I would suggest you keep you mouth shut and stop your posting because you are violating SEC rules by presenting confidential information about corporate negotiations in an attempt to manipulate the stock price. If you are not an insider, your comments are only YOUR crazy guesses and predictions. If the latter, no one really cares what you think beyond that it is YOUR opinion.
icon url

Cougar6

11/05/10 10:39 AM

#38691 RE: conagra #38687

I agree, they could, but why? What is the advantage to them? The more they play those games the more likely the court is to award special damages. Besides, if they wanted to go that route they should have filed a different response.

I think they know that we are in a weak bargaining position and they can get a better deal than their competition will get if they are the first in.

Besides, it just never felt like that was the route they were going.