i have to assume the 40% refers to finished product (i.e the LMW variety) and not bulk heparin which as you point out is outsourced virtually 100% by all heparin companies
it is feasible i guess to have 2 facilities in which you then process the bulk - one outsourced and the other in house (i guess as a backup or if you are expecting huge demand??), but does this make sense for a product like lovenox. we know for biologics switching facilities is such a headache - every litte change in condition affects finished product. the same is true for lovenox, so why would teva have to get 2 facilities with that many more lots up to speed and show equivalence? perhaps genisi can clarify and btw genisi thanks (and i appreciate the transparency in your divulging the source)