All we know thus far is that the comments section next to the CLYW filing on the court website showing the documents, shows "U/A" which Ben Lurkin says means it has been taken "under advisement". It will be up to the judge to determine what he wants to do with it. Maybe some of the lawyerly types can address what they think is required in terms of procedure... and what that motion now requires in terms of any change in the sequences in addressing things. Does the judge need to address and dispose of that motion before trial starts ? I don't know...
Whatever the requirements, I don't think we'll find out what the judge thinks about those things right away...
Today is the deadline for completion of the court ordered ADR.
We still don't know what the court is going to do with the Williamson Resnak filing to quash the CLYW effort to depose Williamson, which seems it was not timely filed...
I think it likely we may see the deposition issues be resolved, first, before the judge worries about ruling on the CLYW motions... but, that is jsut my guess...
So, I'm thinking it will be that dispute that drives the timing in events for the next week or so.
I don't think CLYW has been dragging their heels in seeking depositions... but I also don't think Markle for CLYW is going to allow Williamson to succeed in making his lack of cooperation into CLYW's problem. What we're seeing from Williamson thus far, IMO, is "more of the same"... and I don't think that is going to change, but also don't think it is going to fly this time...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
