From what I've read elsewhere, a Sennen shareholder called the BCSE and complained about the Queensland Coal deposits not being 43-101 compliant. Sennen has stated them again, using the words "Historical" and "Not 43-101" all throughout the PR.
Sennen has ALWAYS stated they were not 43-101 compliant and were historical. This work was done by Shell in the 1990's and is considered to be very reliable. So reliable in fact the Aussie gov't has granted MDL's (Mineral Development Licenses) on 2 of the properties, with the 3rd on the way. Differences between Aussie and Canadian standards?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
