InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lotterystk

10/28/10 11:53 AM

#12335 RE: Alleyba1 #12332

Thanks guys, that is exactly what John Benvengo has decided to do. He is not saying anything to any of us anymore, and I can't blame him. Tell me, when any of you have talked to him, do you ever ask if it was okay to pass anything onto the boards? I always did. I do not believe the Mr. Benvengo that I talked to today would say something as specific as the co. has 6 more months. Sounds like the very type of distortion that Mr. Benvengo is fed up with. No matter what is happening...I cannot blame him, seeing some of the narcissistic ruminations on this board and especially on the worthless EG.

Get real folks. The few pieces any of us have does not make a true picture. We squint and try to gestalt our way to a definitive picture...but none of us have it, but many will not admit it. Most will make whatever gestalt figure they want and then run with it here. It serves no useful purpose to our investment.
icon url

Barney Vissur

10/28/10 12:11 PM

#12337 RE: Alleyba1 #12332

Query...if this is a non-revenue company, though, the books are not that relevant to be done "by accountants." What is there? Funds that came in from share sales and expenses. That's it. No revenues to analyze and no valuable assets purchased to review - only operating expenses from sales of authorized stock. Why would the financing group want to invest, but for the technology that allegedly is in place? That's it. Hate to say it, but don't really see the "accountants" being all that relevant. And, if the dilution occurred to get the books current, why is there no indication that ANY year was done, let alone being "current?" Their website still has not been updated for BOD's, financial info, or any news since 4/26/10 if someone is searching to find efforts to get the books current or noting the new board members. Oh well.

Maybe the alleged financier's issue is simply the same issue the skeptics have - trust.