you're telegraphing your moves to everyone. If you were really threatening legal action, then right now, your lawyer would be advising you to keep your chess moves close to your chest, imo.
That means, imo, you have neither seen an attorney nor will you be taken seriously until you do. Furthermore, since you are not a lawyer, you may be sounding completely ridiculous from Peter's perspective, a man who is a lawyer. Depositions and subpoenas aren't just carried out willy nilly.
midtier, let's face it, you are undereducated when it comes to the ways of the attorney (as am I, because I'm not a lawyer), hence either go see a competent attorney specializing in this sort of thing or get off the pot, lol.
I imagine just finding the right attorney will be quite some work. You will need someone(s) who is/are competent in securities law, international law (so that you can serve Peter in London), possibly Nigerian law, (so you can serve Sir Emeka Offor), etc.
Your attorney must be shrewd enough to know what defenses can be used and whether you have the wherewithal to fight them. Already, I don't see how you get past the Warren Buffett defense, whereby a majority shareholder does possess both material information and substantial influence on his investment but in exchange agrees not to trade on it or let his buddies trade on it. And that's just off the top of my head, and I'm not a lawyer.
So until you ACTUALLY talk to an attorney, all your posts are hot air, and that's just the way it is.
Krombacher