InvestorsHub Logo

NateJones

10/25/10 9:05 PM

#85537 RE: Renee #85534

Now that's what I've been talking about Renee!

The only way this could have occured is by a combo of share swapping and naked short selling. When's the run to cover happen?? I'll hold to find out. In fact I'm popping pop-corn and pulling up a chair. GTC's are set high in anticipation. Have a great day.

GLTA!

Nate :-)



At no time ever have I said categorically that insiders have sold their shares , but my arguments are valid that 1.714 billion shares could not have traded in 35 trading days unless they had , particularly when soooooooooooooooooooooooooo many longs boasted about buying and holding their shares of a 106 million public float . That is logical conjecture.

venomen2002

10/25/10 10:18 PM

#85546 RE: Renee #85534

I disagree completely..
as I was one that looked into why TDA stopped allowing buys..You might remember that I was told it was due to churning the stock..When people trade stock they don't own you could have 2 billion shares traded in two weeks depending on if anyone wants to get caught or not..

Your previous post specifically stated..

"A few reasons why I bought EXPH :"

"NO TOXIC financings , therefore NO dilution through financings that ALWAYS cripple a stock's performance ."

"Numerous Blue Chip companies that buy Expo's productlines which provides recurring revenues for company cash-flow viability , and also confirms the best validation on planet earth to Expo Holdings being a legitimate company ."

"No wishy-washy bazillion dollar contracts in foreign countries that so many other OTCBB's and OTC's declare , but no-one can ever confirm . Expo is a U.S.A. company that shareholders can visit so that personal confirmations can be made and shared with others ."

"RESOLVE requires macro-picture commitments ....the Big Picture in owning EXPH shares ."

Renee


Like I said to each their own and I really don't care if investors change their mind about their investments..but the fact is none of the points you made has changed one bit..In fact I keep reading where all the PRs the company puts out are false..but since you put out many pr's by the company that you say were misleading could you please show which ones were proven wrong out of all the PRs you posted..I can see where etc played into the bigger picture of 2009 and in fact that was stated in the conference call that indeed etc was being counted on for the majority of the business for the last two quarters of 2009..I can see that if etc didn't get the retailer which it didn't..that earnings would be off as projected given what was projected..Also as we now know the Food Lion contract was delayed..However Renee can you prove which of the the majority of PRs that you posted about didn't happen as prd..If you could look them over again and tell us what didn't happen by facts that you have..then I would like to see it posted here one PR at a time..Making a blanket post that all the PRs the company has put out is not only false but also misleading as you claim the company has done..

On the topic of the mangement or insiders selling their shares at any time..you still have no proof that any shares have been sold..just conjecture based on the number of shares traded..If you can show me a link to the insiders selling shares I would like to see one..On that topic..I have seen posts saying that the company has enough preferred shares to block any vote..That also has no link or proof..In fact the company has said that they switched over to common shares..Since no one can prove that one way or the other and it is conjecture the Ibox has this which needs to be removed..

"it's anyone's guess how many preferred are issued. Shareholders votes are not necessary for JD to constantly raise the A/S, so a logical conclusion is preferred shares issued and outsatnding control voting rights."

As I said that is a pure guess and I take offense to putting that in the Ibox as the company could have control of the voting due to the insiders holding the greater amount of common shares..It is not proven in either case and that needs to be removed..

The bottom line is that even on what some may consider larger volume days like today..
31,630,416..that is still less 2 percent of the OS..To me Renee that speaks to the majority of shares being held and with all the posts over the last days from known traders..it would suggest that EXPH is in play again by the traders to be bought and sold and not by the longs who would much rather just buy and hold or just hold...veno