InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jbsliverer

10/25/10 9:59 AM

#102346 RE: banyon #102342

I sure didn't hear anyones complaints or questions when only the few people on the "flock" and promoter board were taking their survey. Considering this survey hasn't even had a chance and is quite early, and some of the so called "banned" list you speak of weren't longs or aren't anymore, but the opposite and includes a promoter (which I suspect paid by the company, IMO) and people that have more interest in talking about others than the company.

Considering its just a survey and as all types of surveys are just what they are, but considering it wasn't even brought up how small a sample was on any other "survey", it seems quite funny these things are now.

But know one knows how it will turn out or how many, but this stock has been on a downtrend and just because it gets a little uptick here or a down tick there, its still generally on a downtrend and showing quite a loss from when the announcement was made about the reverse razzle dazzle and I think that shows the sentiment of all the shareholders.

And by the way, I do think there is always manipulation, just not by the MMs in this case so much, the MMs are just a conduit for it and there seems to be manipulation by the company and/or its promoters to try to manipulate this up more than anyone is trying to manipulate it down. Try harder, not doing so well and since I don't short super sub penny pinkys, I'll play and make some money if they put more required effort in for success instead of failure. LOL
icon url

BigBake1

10/25/10 10:00 AM

#102347 RE: banyon #102342

Granted, I would not draw a conclusion from 15 votes so far, but he is merely pointing out what information has been gleaned so far from the survey.

But your insistence that 7400 shareholders voting is absurd and not founded upon the principles of how surveys work. You will never get the entire shareholder base to vote here, thus why you get a sample group.