InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

zabone

10/22/10 3:04 PM

#38122 RE: conagra #38115

Carter, And you know these facts how? Do you know the people involved in this case on a personal level or are you an insider to CLYW or do you have eyes and ears in either of the two law offices that are handling this case? The one thing I have notices about people on these message boards is that speak as if they really know what the hell is going on when in fact, nobody knows what anyone will do unless they are part of one of the three groups above. Beyond that, it is all guess work and speculation. You can't always predict the future by looking at the past. People cannot even predict the weather correctly beyond 24 hours with all of the technology they use to do it.

My 2 cents
icon url

downsideup

10/22/10 3:51 PM

#38128 RE: conagra #38115

Agree it isn't likely they'll settle with Daic... which is good.

I doubt the court will find it useful to enable Williamson in his efforts in obstruction.

Delays are "perfect" when the purpose of them is "doing the right thing" and "getting it right" in and as the result. In this case, the difference is not less than $0.58 a share, and is likely going to be a WHOLE lot more... probably worth $3.50 a share or more in the end prior to considering any potential addition from damages that might be assessed.

I don't have any quibbles with you thinking you've made a sharp trade... but, folks here have been fighting this battle for a couple of years already, have a lot of perspective you will not, and most still here are not here for a difference of a few pennies, more or less... rather than for seeing the problems through to being corrected and properly resolved with the full value realized.







icon url

HighRider

10/22/10 8:15 PM

#38138 RE: conagra #38115

Maybe not tuesday, but by friday next week mark it on your calendar 29 Oct, Williamson is gone, my prediction. I'm not going to explain the reason Williamson needs to go, that should be self evident.

As far as Daic settling with Calyso, he may not, I certainly wouldn't rule it out, but he will lose his butt if he doesn't. If you don't think that he will, I would certainly advise you to sell your shares on monday because Calypso will no longer exist. In your scenario Daic won't settle, leaving Calypso no option but to pursue getting the original case reversed. If he won't settle based on the 2008 agreement, then Calypso has to pursue a reversal. You see, Daic is the only one with the ability to offer anything at this point. Calypso has already given them everything they can. The judge of course could rule the 2008 agreement is valid, the Daic parties have interfered and Calypso does not have to meet any additional requirements or something along those lines.