Originally costing 3M, and they spent 130k on it? and 24k to fix it up. Something is missing. Does not seem right. I don't understand. If it was in disrepair, I would have thought they would have done more than paint it, and would have had to invest more cash. And I would have thought the land value was more.... It seems artificially low, but that does not benefit anybody.
In the last financials they said they repaired a few gaskets, etc... and painted. The number (24k) would be appropriate for painting... which is unnecesary for an operating plant but makes it look nice and "shiny".