InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Lambster

10/19/10 2:39 PM

#29646 RE: NORTH LAND #29643

Bigbreak, I am very disappointed that you would include Tigger in that group. The Tig has been nothing but helpful and honest throughout this ordeal, and whether or not you believe in his chart method or not, it doesn't change the fact that he has been very informative on this site fopr a very long time, and many here enjoy his posts. Long live the Tigger!!
icon url

madtig6

10/19/10 2:43 PM

#29647 RE: NORTH LAND #29643

bb-I never said there would be a huge sell off. I merely stated that if we didn't get approval and the technicals stayed the same, that .25 was well within the realm of possibilities.

Just countering your "impossibility" of .25 ever being seen again.

And I don't really think I am in the same category as the other three you mentioned, as I back up my theories with charts.

So maybe you are smarter than the other three - I'll let them defend themselves.

I hope you get there is no ill will being projected here by me. Just presenting another possibility and view.
icon url

IMGG4TP

10/19/10 3:31 PM

#29650 RE: NORTH LAND #29643

Bigbreak......Accumulation is not defined by, and nor is it characterized as, "normal backing and filling". Before he used the word as frequently as you do, I would think a normally intelligent person would look it up to find out what it means.
icon url

mr_sano

10/19/10 3:33 PM

#29651 RE: NORTH LAND #29643

BBreak I think you have to ask yourself where is the runup? We are still near yearly lows and the pps has been unable to mount an attack over .30. Yes I expected much lower prices after the many guestimates failed.