InvestorsHub Logo

Sheepdog

10/15/10 2:32 AM

#19101 RE: ooag_long #19100

...and Barnett is in "good" company with those mentioned.

Speculation is nice considering Barnett has made sure the asset owners don't know what they own.

No more posting allowed about how great this company is without referencing the terms of the settlement. It is a simple fact that this company has NEGATIVE value without that settlement. Until shown otherwise, this company is worthless BY ADMISSION of Barnett in the recent financials (released well after the May and June pump PR's of course).

grapeman

10/15/10 1:50 PM

#19108 RE: ooag_long #19100

I would hope allof it comes true,, that would make this a better world,,, but I would not count an any of it.
The proof will be in the pudding.
Hoping and guessing here is like trying to read the air.
I will watch.

<<well its interesting how things have simmered down even for the staunchest critic (tomorrow i will probably say i spoke too soon) never the less, because management has specific intensions to make a go of things and that they now have a reasonable share structure, people are keeping track of it--no matter how bad ppl dislike barnett most of the microcap penny pinks are run by lanza's or lanza's to be

my money still says that there will be an uplisting and that the divergence between ooag's chart and bdgr's will prove to be the single most telling sign other than the original 5th amemded pleading

Real >>