InvestorsHub Logo

milehighbuck

10/14/10 12:07 PM

#101647 RE: tikasun #101645

What is not "unknown" is that Fisher rarely does what he claims. So, why would you hold any reasonable hope that he will change his pattern after repeated failures ? Truly astonishing.

IcePickr

10/14/10 12:14 PM

#101648 RE: tikasun #101645

Tika, if their intentions were good, and for the benefit of investors, there are clearly a few things they would be doing to reassure investors:

1. BNPD should Un-gag the Transfer Agent
2. BNPD should reduce the Authorized Shares from 2.5 Billion to something a little more reasonable.
3. Share the current BNPD share structure publicly and how this deal will dilute current BEHL shareholders further. Do you really think current BNPD Execs/shareholders won't want a BIG PIECE of the PIE?
4. Explain how BEHL Preferred shares will be handled, and how Private investments in the company by Dennis & his family will be handled.
5. Provide the share structure of BNPD and BEHL that is expected after the deal is completed. 1 for 10 isn't good enough. Tell us the whole story

Get your head out of the sand and pay attention to whats going on here.

To say it will not be good for current shareholders is like prejudging the deal or future status of BNPD/BEHL on behalf of S/Hs. At this point in time we await finalization although the PRs give us enough insight.

jbsliverer

10/14/10 12:47 PM

#101657 RE: tikasun #101645

Trend indications are a lot of what a shareholder needs to look at. Where might the pps go or company go in "future tense" The market is nothing but "prejudging" any "deals or future status" of a company for behalf of oneself. If one does nothing but "await finalization", especially with the history and statistics of a company like BEHL, blindy follow or sit idle, then the odds are setting up for a loss and not doing proper DD.

PR's might give insight, but only between the lines and what is not said in them with most pink sheet companies. Not the fluff in order to sell themselves to unsuspecting monies or continued shareholders loss of capitol. BEHLs or BNPDs (same people in control of the money) PR's are only designed for those purposes.

If as been said, if so much business can be expected for just setting up or constructing PBR's, why do they need to split it up. This so called 20% plus could be plus ALL, not just part. It is very probable that there won't be enough selling and setting up of these PBRs. BEHL does have some stiff competition to compete with, a market that the big money is investing in other PBR's by bigger companies with what is recognized by the majority of the investment community better PBRs and methods.

If one is in view that BEHL or BNPD has the best, it won't matter. It will matter where the majority of the money is going and who really is already selling and producing PBRs, etc and algae. Now for the most part, that entails private companies, but is changing, but again doesn't matter. What matters is where is the money going. Right now and what looks like in the future better and bigger companies taking that market that a supposed separate BEHL has to recieve from putting up PBR after PBR after PBR. A PBR that can be put up rather quickly by anyone practicaly. Thats not looking good to say the least and more looks like it will just become an accounting shell or simular in worth.