I can understand how you got this impression, as you cannot review the deleted posts. I was able to read most of wbmw's posts before they were deleted, and I think he has a valid point. Hopefully, Matt will agree when he reviews them.
Troy, it's not so much the rhetoric of one particular poster, but the persistence of the thread in general to accuse me of alterior motives when posting. The examples were meant to illustrate how one particular poster has resurrected a feeling of ill will, even though I have tried to defend myself multiple times. If you'd like to see more obvious examples, I have plenty. Here are a few.
If you'll notice, it's not just one particular instance from one particular person. It's a number of people who aim to "defend" their stock from what they perceive as a verbal attack from me. I have already tried to explain that I am not attacking their stock, but such explanations have not ceased the inquisitions or the flames. I don't think that I should be excluded from expressing my opinion, which I consider to have both positive and negative points.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
