You really think your feeble bashing can scare anyone with a brain? 1. Arena has insurance that will defend against these misguided claims. 2. There was no failure by Arena management to disclose anything material, but there was a failure by the FDA to present a materially accurate case to the panel and to have a competent set of experts present. Why did the FDA misrepresent the risk to make it appear stat sig and therefor material, and why did the FDA stack the panel for a no vote by intimidation and by deliberately (could not have been accidental given the moa of the FDA's attack) not have a scientist present who could competently speak to the rat study question?