InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ursa

09/24/10 12:40 PM

#34237 RE: TRAPPER JIM #34235

trapper thanks a bunch for the dd, i think there is a lot of gold there but we need the assays back
icon url

bigstocksnbonds

09/24/10 12:47 PM

#34239 RE: TRAPPER JIM #34235

Trapper--

Thanks for your couple of messages last night, about CNEX. I heard a mention of what you were saying, on the board this morning too. I don't think it will affect CNEX that much IMO. Price is down a bit, but not sure exactly why. Did you decide to stay in? Good luck wth your decisions!
icon url

bigstocksnbonds

09/24/10 12:55 PM

#34241 RE: TRAPPER JIM #34235

Trapper---

leiyu467, in post number #34187 today, mentions the article this morning, but I don't think CNEX was involved in anything wrong.
icon url

geo_newfie

09/24/10 2:18 PM

#34263 RE: TRAPPER JIM #34235

The problem is the pink is lower left to upper right, while the mapped geology and indicated shear zone is lower right to upper left (at least on their map). This would seem to indicate that the anomaly is NOT associated with the shear zone.

Nevertheless, it could indicate the existence of a mafic sill. A sill is just an igneous intrusion (magma) that is layered with the surrounding rocks. I know if at least one Au-related mafic sill in the Abitibi Greenstone Belt, which is located to the east of here.