The statement Richard Pattin made in announcing the suit said they expected "hundreds of millions"... and that was from a single infringer who was and is not the largest. I think that the numbers will very likely be "large". It is not inconceivable that what we are looking at in terms of short term share prices might prove to be per share revenues in the mid to longer term.
Again, QCOM has been a frequent comparison. It might be instructive to look at QCOM's business... although the initial QCOM tech patents were perhaps not nearly as ubiquitous as cell phones are now.