InvestorsHub Logo

bradford86

09/23/10 5:45 PM

#526 RE: bradford86 #524

http://www.ripoffreport.com/brokerage-companies/www-stockholderloan/stockholderloan-com-deceptive-48d52.htm

Report: Www.stockholderloan.com
Share Reported By: (New York New York )
stockholderloan.com Deceptive Stock Loan Company Advertising Lies and Operating Illegally Irvine California
... Still Waiting...


2
Author
0
Consumer
2
Employee Respond to this report!

What's This?Are you an owner, employee or ex-employee with either negative or positive information about the company or individual, or can you provide "insider information" on this company?

Victim of this person/company?

What's This?Are you also a victim of the same company or individual? Want Justice? File a Rip-off Report, help other consumers to be educated and don't let them get away with it!

Remove a Ripoff Report?Www.stockholderloan.com
2070 Business Center Drive Suite 160
Irvine California 92612
U.S.A.
Phone: 800-528.8209
Web Address:


Category: Brokerage Companies


Submitted: Thursday, September 11, 2008
Last posting: Tuesday, November 11, 2008
This company is run by one Tony Gentile, who decided one day that he would put up a website loaded with falsehoods to try to make his company seem as if it is as legitimate as established companies like Emerging Money Corporation and HedgeLender or larger companies offering stock loans through credit unions.

His lies include the statement that his stock loan company has been in business for "two decades". This is patently false. His website has not even been up for 2 years.

He puts up a list of phony "testimonials" that Gentile himself wrote, all praising his crooked enterprise. None of the individuals exist.

He operates his company in California without a Finance Lender's License, which is required of every individual brokering or offering financial services, including loans, in the state of California, even though he operates from and gives his address as California.

Gentile takes individuals' stocks and dumps them on the open market by selling them, causing the price to drop, then he gives a portion of the sale to the "borrower" - and has the nerve to charge him interest. He then pockets the difference between the stock value and "LTV" of his crooked loan.

This individual has also touted his loan as "tax free" - and the IRS has been alerted. He spends a lot on Google Adwords because his company is so new that it cannot place for any organic (natural) search results under key words like "stock loan".

We hope that this disgusting company will be put out of business and people will be protected from victimizing any more clients. Let us hope that enough people are alerted to this con artist soon.

Reporter999
New York, New York
U.S.A.

bradford86

09/23/10 5:49 PM

#527 RE: bradford86 #524

Denver, Colorado USA, Sep 15, 2010 aEUR" Enhance Skin Products Inc. (EHSK - OTCBB),is pleased to announce that it has filed a Form S-1 with the SEC to register its shares in regard to an Indirect Primary Offering Agreement (IPOA) and a Registration Rights Agreement (RRA) with the Crisnic Fund S.A.. As detailed in the Form 8-K filed 6 August, 2010 , the Crisnic Fund will purchase up to $2 Million of the CompanyaEUR(TM)s common shares.These purchases will be done at the CompanyaEUR(TM)s discretion and will be made at the market price without any discount or investment banking fees. These funds will be used not only tolaunch the Direct-to-Consumer strategy but to expand the product lines for both the Visible Youth and the Visible Youth aEURoePROFESSIONALaEUR line-up of cosmeceutical products.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=53185613

mog1962

09/23/10 5:52 PM

#528 RE: bradford86 #524

I have read some of the material regarding China Armco before and that seems a bit different than what occurred regarding CTT unless someone could prove or show that Crisnic had a hand in the price drop. However, since they did not seem to get more stock, but rather never purchased stock for the price agreed upon the situation may be quite different.

Personally, I would leave the Crisnic matter to CTT management. As to CNAM and others, what might be their chances with an off-shore company?