InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

soundc

09/23/10 1:03 PM

#38359 RE: Nanotoday #38358

read it all neg-nano : Correction: May 30, 1993, Sunday An article last Sunday about investor research that is underwritten by the companies being studied characterized an analyst's report on Columbia Laboratories Inc. incorrectly. Columbia did not pay for the report. It says that the analyst identified himself as a representative of a securities firm, and that it dealt with him as with any other analyst.
icon url

BonelessCat

09/23/10 8:19 PM

#38363 RE: Nanotoday #38358

The fact is the guy that wrote the article had a glaring error reported as fact. No personal attack against him, just his article and reliability as an authoritative source.