Replies to post #27279 on BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[tentacle]

The main reason I am hanging on, is that I have only pennies per share to lose.

The only credibility left in the company for me is the fact that Dr Gold is still on the board.

I have watched lots of microcaps trying to develop, and this one takes the cake for poor, irregular communication. I thought Burgar was a ray of hope in that he lay down some goals, but I just don't see predictable communication regarding those goals or explanations of why they are missed.

COMMUNICATION is everything, and Biocurex management has let us down badly on this front.

Even if they come through in the future, I'm afraid I would still be dissatisfied with the tortuous road that has been traveled.

[Gold Seeker]

My My, Half, what an incredibly juvenile tale. You think Moro has something secret that he isn't telling anyone? If you haven't noticed Half, Moro has been writing papers or presenting his work on RECAF at meeting for years and years yet apparently no one pays little attention.

Moro has been working with RECAF for about 26 years. Does anyone want to admit that their life's work has not met with success?

"There are many in this world that have never even heard of Recaf yet that are waiting for Recaf to be available."

OK Half, why aren't Vets buying RECAF like hotcakes?

RECAF for diagnostics is just technology that has not been accepted. If you listen to Moro, he makes the product sound fantastic. Look at Abbott. They licensed RECAF based on a small study in November 2004 that indicated 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Well, they licensed it for evaluation and found it wasn't even close to those numbers. Look at the contrasting data published in May 2006. Also look at the disclaimers for Dog RECAF to keep from being sued. There Moro discloses that at 99% specificity, the sensitivity can be as low as 50% to 65%. Now, those numbers I would believe and NOT the ones published in 2004 for Abbott.

So Half, the problem for investors in this stock is relying upon what Moro optimistically states. I agree that I had the same problem. I wanted to believe what he said.

[i_invest_utrade]

I know Dr. Moro is a very smart man and has developed a very useful technology.

My main issue is with the promises.

Why even bother giving guidance you will probably not be able to meet?

I saw this in another investment and eventually the CEO stopped. In fact this particular CEO began to understate guidance.

By over inflating guidance Dr. Moro has done a great disservice to the technology and the shareolders.

I wait to see what will happen but the history of this company shows me that announcements go over like a lead balloon and guidance is to be taken as fantasy.

I do wish Dr. Moro well, but their execution of communications is terrible and has greatly reduced their credibility.