I completely understand and agree with the point of your post. Specifically, I would however argue that USEG actually does meet a value criteria based on its trading at a significant discount to it's asset value. In fact, assuming the appeal holds up on the lawsuit they have long been engaged in, the company will have about 40% of its market cap comprised of cash.
I understand you're saying it doesn't meet it in the true sense of the word in regard to PE, cash flow, ect. but when you can buy a company comprised of appreciating assets selling way below their FMV, doesn't that essentially make it a value stock to some degree?
I appreciate you protecting the integrity of the board. I understand that's exactly what your doing and applaud the effort. I just own some USEG and thought it was an appropriate idea for this forum. I respect you and your opinions regardless if you disagree.
SM