InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Unique Investment

09/12/10 1:30 PM

#96160 RE: pxxpy7 #96158

pxxpy7... It is a very bad feeling we get when it appears that an online ad in the WSJ is supposed to have been placed for 200,000 views/clicks and not one person is able to view such except for one alleged screenshot at 9:00am that day. We have seen plenty of people concerned here since not one of them was able to view what is supposed to be an ad for us. Now we're hearing about the Optimum/Cablevision thing and we are presented with someone posting an ad here yet no one else being able to see such ad anywhere.

This is getting to be a concern. Were both of these things nothing more than mockups and these things didn't actually happen? I also see zero on the cablevision/optimum pages for contact info and see zero in print. No cablevision pr to mention our great service. No GOIG pr to announce that the WSJ ad was running. Frankly, I'm starting to feel this is one elaborate ruse and for those of you that think GOIG is "more than your avg pinksheet" company and therefore "has to be" legit, think again. Good ol' Madoff pulled his scam for years on the most highly intelligent of individuals and investors, save for the feds, so don't for once think that it can't happen here.

If no ad tomorrow in the WSJ, imo it's a huge scam.
icon url

malekabal42

09/12/10 3:31 PM

#96177 RE: pxxpy7 #96158

I don't believe he has a big interest in Goig. If he did, text to 46800 would be in every ad. They are pushing optimum like crazy. I'll tell you something else, other than the way the Dolans have screwed up my beloved NY Knicks, the father (Charles Dolan) is a very shrewd businessman and if he has an interest in Goig, then this is my retirement stock!