Replies to post #69203 on Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[ergo sum]

From John - Posted to FB on his honeymoon:

Post 1) As TRTN had not filed anything until Javaco to change shell status, Kidds shares are restricted for 12 months. As for "Smith" -- I asked him to verify his identify and he refused. I suspect someone managing my facebook accidentally let him in.

Post 2) JBII (I really don't like dealing with this on my honeymoon): Kidd shares do not go unrestricted next week. Anyone who is bringing that up clearly does not understand securities. The company was a shell as of April 24, 2009. The SEC has very clear rules that shell company restricted stock issued must be held for 12 months.

Post 3) After the JAvaco/Pakit quarter the companies 144 stock is then held for 6 months.

Post 4) Again, I would go back to these people raising the questions who are clearly not shareholders and look at motive. You can find the rules on the Internet for rule-144 as it pertains to companies without operations. As far as the SEC is concerned the company did not begin ops until April 2010 and therefore stock must be held (including mine) at least until then).

Post 5) As for the tape business: We were sol-sourced by NASA after July 2009 -- July 24, 2009 (I believe) to be exact. That's when the tape business kicked into high gear. It took a long time to jump through all the hoops to build those relationships to open doors and orders.

Post 5.1) Back to my honeymoon - talk to you on the Q&A call

Post 6) Oh, one last thing, the media credits are billed against the $10M. To date we've only used up $200k of it for all the papers and radio we have advertised in.. Long way to go.. And it is invoiced and accountable.. Therefore very real. AND I am having both businesses valued (and the air handling company).

Post 6.1) See you all later -- have fun with the trolls.

Post 7) Oh - Kidd doesn't have 3.5M shares. He has not filed a Form 4 lately (go figure) and no we have no relationship with him. And no, he can't sell them on the open market.

Post 7.1) Good luck all -- talk to you next week.

At this point, I told him to throw his computer away or out the window.

[cfoofme]

Laughable isn't it?

How can you be so audacious? Do you seriously contend that, because a news article referenced a United Nations report in connection with JBI, the CEO of JBI necessarily must have read an internet message board post regarding the report, then conveyed that message board post to the media, which in turn referenced the report in an article on JBI?

[jjsmith]

Please read my past posts. Look back and see who the first person was that said they will have issues with the EPA/DEC and will need a permit? Many said they didn't need a permit since P2O doesn't pollute. Wrong.

Who was one of the first to say the media credits were overstated on the books by at least $9 million dollars? Who pointed out that the blog pumping JBII was run by the investor relations head (James Parker) who didn't disclose on the blog that he actually worked for them? By the way it, all his info was taken off the blog and it was turned over to an internet poster once I pointed this out. Who was the first to uncover that the tape business was a huge money loser?

I could go on all night and day listing FACTS that I have uncovered and been attacked for, that turned out to be dead spot on. Who was the first to inform everyone that the hearing on the "E" was a waste of shareholder dollars and that they had P2ZERO chance of getting it overturned?

Who pointed out that there was a illegal false stock brochure created and distributed about JBII with false claims of huge profits ($.18/share) that was promptly deleted from the authors web site once I pointed it out in attempt to not leave a trail of securities fraud?

Anyone who follows my writings know that my posts are as accurate as they get. I am not well liked because I am not just gonna sit back and let people pump a company for their own benefit at the expense of others. People deserve to hear the unbiased truth about JBI and that is what I deliver.

How can you be so audacious? Do you seriously contend that, because a news article referenced a United Nations report in connection with JBI, the CEO of JBI necessarily must have read an internet message board post regarding the report, then conveyed that message board post to the media, which in turn referenced the report in an article on JBI? Does that mean that anytime one posts about a publicly available document on an internet message board, and the media subsequently references the same document in an article concerning a company relevant to such report, it is reasonable to conclude that the CEO of the subject company discovered the report by scouring internet message boards, and then conveyed the message to the media?

Although I don't doubt that substantive message board posts find their way to corporate offices, including those at JBI, I have trouble comprehending why an internet poster should be automatically credited with bringing the findings of a public organization to the attention of a corporation simply because the poster mentioned the information on the internet before the company mentioned it publicly (or the media on the company's behalf, as the case may be). There was no mention of this or any other message board in the article, and, given the company's focus on the environment and advances in technology, I would think the company would be in close contact with governmental bodies and some environmental organizations that attribute to the company's knowledge base.

For whatever it is worth, a shareholder in my presence made a comment to the CEO regarding an apparent topic du jure of the message board crowd during the weekend of the AGM. The CEO (JB)stated that he does not pay attention to the message boards, to which I responded that he had chosen a wise approach. I don't dismiss the value of internet circles for keeping up to date on recent developments (for example, I found the article at issue by perusing the boards), but I think it goes without saying that a CEO's time is best spent elsewhere.