Looks right to me but it will be a while before we know any true widths-------btw there's a 1970 article by J. David Lowell and John M. Guilbert on porphyry coppers if someone wants to try to find it.
Sounds good. Frankly these results are about as good as you can expect on initial holes.
Mining is about finding the needle in the haystack but first you need to find a haystack (ancient massive volcanic sulphide zone), which they appear to have done. The needle is the main ore body.
They know this is not the main body and the IP will be used to get an underground image of what is underground. Another nice thing is that these results are near the surface so IP works better and follow up drilling may not require more expensive heavier deep earth drills.
I'm no expert but visible Chalcopyrite bodes well for the assays, that there is evidence of good percentage copper.