InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

AneelaAnjum

09/07/10 4:42 PM

#17604 RE: AneelaAnjum #17603

Sorry, I mean to say it doesn't make any sense to go to SEC now. Whoever has got my cell number may call me and have any question may call me. I am cancelling my plan to go to Washington DC.
icon url

lildaniel

09/07/10 5:36 PM

#17605 RE: AneelaAnjum #17603




that is all very strange as in my dealings with SEC they are quite specific in that they will not report back to the complainant with their findings, they listen and do not comment positively or otherwise.

what is the name of the person you spoke to?

icon url

fbinvestor

09/08/10 8:09 AM

#17606 RE: AneelaAnjum #17603

This is not rocket science, but we need to see the big picture. Then the securities fraud becomes evident (even to SEC personnel).

1. Manipulation of a share price or volume:

- misleading press releases to pump the share price have allowed the heavy selling of shares of VGPR before the eventual crash of the share price to near zero and following R/S.

2. Insider trading

- only one man behind the company, Mr Molen, no employees paid, no project carried out, yet hundreds of millions of shares have been traded.

3. False or misleading SEC reports

- Mr Robert Chew has testified he was paid $7500 during the first quarter of 2010, yet Vega's Q1 report shows total costs of $2500.

4. Theft or misappropriation of funds or securities

- after closing the Butcher Poker site the money deposited by players was stolen.

The main point is that, when one 'rat' is found in the books of a company, more rats will emerge. This principle should be clear to SEC executives as it is the reason why investors are so easily scared (look at the recent finance crisis).