Funny how you can surmise from PN's counterclaim that their shareholders are angry about their lawyer bills. I would think they would be happy to pay that amount of money to a firm to go after a company like CPRK which has never lived up to its contractual agreement. PN wants what is legally due to them ($$$) and their shareholders should be screaming mad they entered a deal with a company (CPRK) that refuses to pay its bills. CPRK has been nothing but LIES!!!!!!! since day 1 and the deception still continues.