InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

edesheim

09/03/10 10:01 AM

#13092 RE: wall_street61 #13090

Nor can you show the words that commons will get cancelled. All indicators dicussed on this board are strong indications commons will remain in tact. why are you here if you are conviced otherwise?!?
icon url

4keywest

09/03/10 10:07 AM

#13096 RE: wall_street61 #13090

if you are such a big time wall street bankruptcy expert, one would think you would have a better handle on spelling and meaning of words.
alterior??
5th grade stuff there, wally.
i'll take the blank check, wally
icon url

USAF

09/03/10 10:07 AM

#13097 RE: wall_street61 #13090



Let me know if you need any help reading through my, and everyone else's posts, mr patriot. Nobody has said this is a given. We have all agreed that it looks very likely. SEC Filings that state commons are excluded in the sale of assets, whereas usually they state that they will be cancelled and not retain value. That is a big difference.

Plus, you can do the best DD in the whole wide world, but if your point gets whittled down to the message, "I am eleventy-billion percent sure that is you buy this stock, you will get cancer" you will lose credibility. 99% of the time. Pay attention to what we are saying, if you want so badly to contradict us. You are right at there being no confirmation of the status of the commons, but my hypothesis is just as valid, and ATM far more likely than yours.

Please don't reply to this unless you are going to have something relevant to say. Offering 'blank checks' is just silly. Kind of like Glen Beck.
icon url

Learning Stocks

09/03/10 10:11 AM

#13099 RE: wall_street61 #13090

There must be something to the information since the stock went from a triple zero subpenney to 15 cents in a little more than 2 weeks. If there were not a significant difference in most BK stocks that would not have happened. But as has been said several times here, it is still speculation. But apparently better than usual speculation.
icon url

$UPERMAN

09/03/10 11:21 AM

#13129 RE: wall_street61 #13090

So i take that you can not show me this specific language that you said showed commons will remain intact?

Actually we have more info to believe the commons will stay intact than you have to proove that they wont. GL