InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

janice shell

09/02/10 8:41 PM

#158509 RE: Vianna #158507

Any comments stating that the short is "ZERO," is "BS" IMO! I am aware of what more individuals hold here and when I subtract those #s and the #s filed in 8Ks by the Company, the result is a negative #, meaning a SHORT position.

HUH?? The o/s is 74.8 billion shares. Sloane owns, what, 17 billion? The note holders presumably still have some left, but none was ever a beneficial owner required to file Schedule 13s.

You believe a bunch of message board posters hold, say 45 billion shares or so? Even more? I really, really don't think so.

But as I've said many times, all you need to prove what you call an "abusive naked short postion" is a NOBO and an OBO. The company's never said anything about that, no doubt because it's well aware that there is no NSS here.
icon url

Fire Lane

09/02/10 8:57 PM

#158514 RE: Vianna #158507

the short interest for FFGO is ZERO, thats an irrefutable fact. anyone claiming otherwise is not being honest
icon url

poster44ny

09/03/10 3:10 PM

#158654 RE: Vianna #158507

Vianna: You spent $16 grand (or more) on this scam, assuming all bought at 0.0001.

Another thing. If this stock was heavily shorted and NSS at a higher SP, it's only because it's such a piece of trash.

Not the reverse.