InvestorsHub Logo

elbiatcho1

08/31/10 4:42 PM

#105968 RE: stock supplier #105966

Don't the shareholders already have majority ownership?
Considering the CEO and Daisy own -zero- commons?

Or is it that BBDA never owned anything in the first place.

It would be less expensive to create your own line of beverages:
http://www.energyfiend.com/2007/08/7-step-guide-to-making-your-own-energy-drink

coal

09/01/10 2:19 PM

#105995 RE: stock supplier #105966

the problem with that is the proprietary information concerning their product is probably worth more to the bigger more established companies insomuch as keeping it off the market would be better than promoting it. its' absence from the market would be more equitable to them in the near term until it could be worked into their own portfolio of products. i am sure mr. weber is aware of such practices and probably has a contingent plan should such a situation arise. then again, maybe he does not and any amount offered that would fill his pockets sufficiently might be cause for a deal. the koma unwind product alone could carry a company to fruition. i am not a basher or pumper of bebevco but i do believe their product is capable of generating high profits. if at the end of the year things are the same then perhaps a change in management would be in order. as we simply do not know what is going on at headquarters bebevco we should give sufficient time as to allow for their program, whatever it may consist of, to work. a little over 1 year is not enough time to prove much, not even ineptitude.