Replies to post #28591 on American Security Resources Corp. (ARSC)

[IBIS]

I agree with you on some of your facts Lowman, but not for the same reasons. ARSC did a piss poor job of marketing their FC. It looks as if they did it themselves. A high priced marketing firm would have added all the bells and whistle enabling funding from a greater audience. ARSC skipped a few steps that were needed when going from concept to production. View this as the X-Prize, competition is high.

With that said, do you agree that the true road block for this technology, ARSC or any other company in this field is the federal government. All we here is America needs to strive for energy independence, all while inserting road blocks to keep that from ever happening.

http://www.science.org.au/nova/111/111print.htm

http://hydrogen.pnl.gov/cocoon/morf/hydrogen

http://www.cder.dz/A2H2/Medias/Download/Proc%20PDF/PARALLEL%20SESSIONS/%5BS02%5D%20Safety,%20RCS/14-06-06/569.pdf

http://www.iphe.net/partners/usa.html#USDOE


This one is the same industry, but not ARSC. This is the kind of information ARSC needs to release to its share holders it would end all the speculations: http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review04/hpd_4_aaron.pdf