InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

November61

08/21/10 7:14 PM

#14484 RE: liable #14483

It doesn't look they want to take this road.

The 8-K is a proof to me that they want to be transparent as much as they can.
On the pink sheet, the CE will be removed and the next level is TRANSPARENT.
Bottom line is they know that Johnny Famous can/could be a gold mine. They want to develop a brand name, with the shoes being the front runner product.
We are NOT dealing with a product that needs approval from TSA ( security product ), or FDA ( cancer medication ), or EPA ( super sand cleaner ), where all these CEOs are hiding behind excuses to dilute and get their paycheck.

We are dealing with a product that is already produced ( the first run is almost sold out .....), so what do you think Gelmon will do the shoes?

Next week, we will see who is right, but beating a 0.0007 penny stock is not necessary. You are starting to make me feel bad and I wonder if I will ever touch a 25 cents slot machine again next time I am in Vegas.

GLTA

icon url

kevinsPENNY

08/21/10 8:52 PM

#14487 RE: liable #14483

I have no doubt we will see financials, and agree with the concensus on the board that the 8-K is a proof to that they want to be as transparent as possible. If what you were saying was actually true they would not of even bothered filing the 8-K. They are spending a great deal of time and money to market the shoes and brand. The Gelmon argument seems weak to me. Come September this stock will be running strong.