I think the problem is perception. I began posting on this board when the stock was .20 - .30 and said I thought it could go to $2 - $3. I was immediately branded a basher because I didn't buy into the amazingly persistent and voluminous effort to make the case that the stock was going to the moon.
Currently I voice the opinion that the stock should go to .75 - $1, once again a very positive view considering it recently traded at 20 cents. Yet you see that as a negative. What's up with that?
I admit that late last year when the stock couldn't get over $1 after drilling, I turned negative and said to sell with a target of .20, but since that turned out to be a very accurate prediction I would call that realism, not negativity.
Can you explain why you interpret an opinion that a stock would go up 10 times or more in value as a negative post?
If you actually read my posts, you'll see that mostly I confront and dispute those with secret sources, mythical dot-connecting stories (none of which have ever come true), $10+ price predictions, and overwhelming odds of finding commercial oil.
So, unless going from 20 cents to a dollar is a negative move, or until the stock trades closer to $10 than $3, I would say I am quite positive and realistic in my posting.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
