InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

seatrade

07/28/10 2:30 PM

#96015 RE: Gofertrder #96013

What secrets do you have to this information?

More make believe.

icon url

Dale C

07/28/10 2:50 PM

#96017 RE: Gofertrder #96013

Wouldn't is seem more likely the Amargosa partner would be putting up some cash toward the joint venture. They could not just be sitting there waiting for the first crop from DVJ to be sold before they pony up the bucks. My thought anyway.
icon url

el_loco09

07/28/10 4:32 PM

#96030 RE: Gofertrder #96013

Borrowing upon borrowing and deposits that are refundable, make this, definitely, a long shot here.

There is nothing wrong with BEHL doing this, but in lieu of their explanation of their financing, anything is possible.



Right. I think that what a lot of behlievers are failing to appreciate here is that it is entirely possible for BEHL to succeed and have management and employees come out ok while at the same time giving the shaft to the holders of the common stock shares. I've been doing this for 20 plus years and I have seen this happen.

BEHL may have huge upside potential but from the current vantage point I'm looking at it from it is far from certain that the holders of the common stock will also benefit. This is the main reason I decided to sell my shares. As more dilution occurs it will get more and more difficult for the common shareholder to prosper even after the company itself starts doing well.
icon url

tikasun

07/29/10 12:13 AM

#96077 RE: Gofertrder #96013

I wonder if this is a tax trick. Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm starting to think that the increase in A/S is coming from installments or dwn payment money from customers. If the shares are used to repay monthly interest and possibly part of borrowed principle, would there be any greater tax advantages as opposed to monthly repayments in cash money ?