InvestorsHub Logo

xZx

07/25/10 5:36 PM

#9921 RE: onemessageonly #9920

remember a while back i mentioned HD could create its own relationship with LBSR, independent of NAK? some here wondered why i wanted to go down that path. i think some were confused why i even cared, since HD controls NAK... but it appears you're thinking along the same lines, no?

If Liberty Star is under the umbrella of hunter Dickinson before hand, all is good. Only a small amount of money under a specific condition is needed for Hunter Dickinson to essentially control Liberty Star Uranium.


HD created NAK, and they could use NAK to swallow LBSR, either in pieces or in one gulp.

HD could also decide to develop LBSR on its own, as a separate entity from NAK, and reap the benefits that way as well.

the question on my mind is this: assuming the claims in BCSP are on par with what NAK currently owns, or perhaps even superior, which way does HD stand to make the most profit? if the JV with NAK bears fruit, is it likely LBSR will become yet another company under HD's umbrella, and possibly uplist to a higher exchange in the process?

by the way, you won't find me disagreeing with your last comment:

How cheap is this security currently? Unbelievably, dirt cheap.

familyof5

07/25/10 5:47 PM

#9924 RE: onemessageonly #9920

So in a round about way you have just answered my question.Thank you.