Replies to post #92842 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[tecate]

Does it say in there that Intel did not declare this correctly in their declarations? Intel is not a party to this and the SEC isn't saying anything to Intel are they ?

[The Duke of URL]

I would be really pissed if this case is about recognizing revenues v. ad money advances v. volume discounts v. how to book cost of goods sold, and some LIAR has twisted it into an Intel anti-trust issue, to intentionally mislead people for their own perverted, illegal and hidden agenda.

Don't you agree?

[imho]

fastpathguru,

In particular, according to the SEC, Dell executives failed to let investors know about large payments from Intel that had been made to convince Dell not to use processors from Advanced Micro Devices in its systems.

"It was these payments rather than the company's management and operations that allowed Dell to meet its earnings targets, the SEC said in a statement July 22."

In the above two paragraphs, the first paragraph is what the author interprets about the payments, yet the second paragraph is a direct quote of the SEC about "these payments". What payments in the second paragraph is the SEC talking about? If it where the payments in the first paragraph, why is the first paragraph not a direct quote, like the second? You digg what I am saying?

IOW, show me the above two paragraphs that are directly from an SEC document and can be quoted as such.

IMHO