InvestorsHub Logo

Oz the OK

07/22/10 3:06 PM

#23746 RE: Talc Moan #23742

EFLN is TRYING to become transparet but there are people TRYING to stop them.



Do you honestly believe this? The last PR, we get a company name only. Some deep digging DD by members on this board revealed, the corporation didn't even exist yet. That's trying to stop their attempt at transparency? Because shareholders wanted to know more info about a potential client than just the corporate name?

Today, we get a PR that states some company (no name)"has entered into a strategic relationship" (WTF is that...a contract, a handshake, an email, a wink over a gin and tonic? How much is it worth...$5, $5,000, $50,000?). Geez Louise, having new carpet put into the office could be considered "a strategic relationship" with a flooring company too.

So you really believe these last two PR's is the company trying to become transparent? They couldn't have been more vague or non-transparent if they wanted to be.

photojunky

07/22/10 4:02 PM

#23755 RE: Talc Moan #23742

I'm sorry but who is trying to stop this company from being transparent? Their news is well overdue, and the news we got was so hard to verify it caused the stock to drop according to some. There is no conspiracy to keep this stock down. Or did I miss something?