InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

railroader

07/20/10 12:40 AM

#1379 RE: murocman #1378

Great article, you don't believe it will go down to the 1.50 level. Where is your target figure? Just getting your opinion. I think that the 1.70 to 1.80 is going to be the low. jmo

Alan
icon url

Dcon

07/20/10 6:30 AM

#1380 RE: murocman #1378

very well put.
icon url

miserman

07/20/10 6:44 AM

#1381 RE: murocman #1378

Valdostavetteguy, RFS2 versus HR 4213

Valdo's numbers are a stretch, even to the Syntroleum people, who by the way DID plan the entire project whilst counting on the $1.00 per gallon subsidy/relief/credit. The lapse thereof surprised everyone and his brother.

Reread the latest CC to find the definitive Steinbaugh quote that clearly puts the issue to rest. The $1.00 per gallon ensures certain profit whereas RFS2 is a market-driven variable.

You might also consider the markets' having ignored the 1 July inception of RFS2. My old lady's cats paid more attention.

We shall see. Suffice it to say that I'll not rebuild my upper block of shares until such time the markets' make THEIR call.