Thanks for the clarification. Why would the lawsuit have to be against Joel Gardner? The official documents (or at least press releases and filings) I have seen have all said the rights were bought from PCL (not Joel Gardner) and thus the shares were paid to PCL as well.
If Joel Gardner somehow got his hands on those shares personally through PCL (because he was on the board and they gave those shares to him or whatever happened) and then he sold them, doesn't that just put PCL at fault still? Something doesn't add up here. Either way it seems as though this Gardner is a complete scumbag, I'm just not sure anything can come from this since all the dealings were with PCL and PCL is now "disbanded".
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
