InvestorsHub Logo
Replies to #98860 on Biotech Values
icon url

biomaven0

07/15/10 3:42 PM

#98862 RE: rkrw #98860

OK, so I withdraw my bumblebee analogy. It's not logically crazy, just farfetched.

Peter
icon url

DewDiligence

07/15/10 6:58 PM

#98883 RE: rkrw #98860

Anonymous Provenge letter that accompanied the pdf file you posted:

http://caretolive.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/anonymous-misinformation-cover-letter.pdf
icon url

jellybean

07/16/10 1:06 PM

#98956 RE: rkrw #98860

Lesson 1 in any graduate program, the use of appropriate controls. The Provenge trial did not have the appropriate control arms and needed a 3rd arm in which patients were mock treated but did not have any immune cells removed or reintroduced.

icon url

biomaven0

07/28/10 11:30 PM

#100067 RE: rkrw #98860

Today's NEJM article on Provenge refutes that short-attack letter you linked to that claimed that the "placebo" arm in the Provenge trial was actually harmful:

The 21.7-month median survival of patients in the placebo group compares favorably with that in control groups in other randomized trials involving similar patient populations (range, 15.5 to 21.7 months),3,5 indicating that the treatment effect cannot be attributed to a poor outcome in the placebo group.

The other striking thing about the data shown in the article was how Provenge beat placebo not just overall, but in virtually every subgroup they looked at (maybe 20 in all). Obviously not stat. sig. in the individual subgroups, but it's the sort of forest plot that reassures me that the effect is real

Peter