InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Student86

07/06/10 12:47 PM

#11949 RE: Realityhurts #11947

I have always said that... reread some of my old posts... I've always said I hoped for the best and there was always hope....

Some of the events that you refer to as lies, I put into context and understand the rationale behind it.


Ok, some of them can be interpreted differently with different contexts.... and some of them maybe we just haven't been updated on yet (Janus and Bluwood deals etc. although I checked with Janus and I can't order a Hartindo or any product from them as I have tried to reach them to do so to no avail you only reach a nice recorded message saying they are "Not available" and then you are disconnected no matter which extension you try to call (try it for yourself), and I have contacted Bluwood and they will NOT say they have had any dealings or bought ANY product from MEVT) but I guess sure.... if you really wanted to make excuses for this management you could write it off that they just haven't updated us on those deals yet...... even though it has been 7 months since those deals were made and Janus for all purposes doesn't exist and Bluwood refuses to tell anyone contacting them that they have ever or will ever do any deals with MEVT.

BUT, at least one of those events I was refering to was a blatant LIE, no interpretation involved.
You know the event I am referring to, the forward split they told us about in 2009 which was to take place on January 5th. Not only did they tell us we would have a forward split (which they delayed AFTER the date of record) but then they said it was postponed and we would be hearing the NEW DATE OF RECORD within "a couple of weeks". Guess what, it has been over 7 months and they have still not updated us on the NEW DATE OF RECORD or if the forward split is on or not.

No matter how you try to twist that, it was a lie, they said we would be updated on the forward split within a matter of weeks, and we NEVER RECEIVED THAT UPDATE ON THE FORWARD SPLIT.
Now some people will argue, "But we were told there was a dividend of EPRO shares being investigated instead of the forward split which they told us about ." I say to that OK, if those same people say they are going only on what management has told us directly, and not any rumors etc, how do you know that.... management never told us that this investigation automatically cancelled the forward split or was instead of the forward split. The only thing management told us was that they would tell us the new date of record within a matter of weeks and they were also investigating a dividend of EPRO shares. Guess what, they never did update us on the forward split, thus they LIED (not to mention the fact that we never even got the update on the EPRO shares dividend either but that's another issue).

Once someone has lied once, it's usually a downward spiral and the lies continue to flow. So you can interpret the other events as "understanding the rationale and context behind it" but once this management has blatantly lied to our faces, I choose to no longer give them the benefit of the doubt when they continue to mislead time and time again. Fool me once, shame on you.... fool me twice, shame on me. But everyone is entitled to interpret the events as they wish...