Re:<"At the AGM, I was the one that asked about future financing and they did give me what I considered an evasive answer. Their CFO replied specifically that they could not rule out another PIPE offering but they hoped not to. I was angry when I found out that they were actually doing a PIPE at the same time as their CFO answered my questions. I questioned JB about this and he said regulations prevented them from answering this question directly at the time. I doubted that and I still have concerns about this event.">
Yes, that was definitely underhanded. Then there is Mr. Bordynuik who named Somerset refinery as a willing customer--without any indication that they closed down months earlier. I'm sure many shareholders relied on that statement when they made their stock purchase. Since that went away, JBII is just another company doing pyrolysis and showing gasoline- and diesel-range alkanes in the resulting liquid. The difference is that JBII currently has a $60 million market cap based on the statements John made about the liquid being salable to refineries.
As I often say, honesty is of paramount importance in a person running a penny stock. So much that the mere fact that they incorporate in Nevada or retain controlling ownership is a statistical no-no and the stock should be avoided.
Mr. Bordynuik has autonomous control over any and all investment money put into JBII and he even dictates his own salary. He 'earned' this level of responsibility merely by paying $80,000 for a shell. It's a really big red flag that he's disingenuous.
.