twilko, that was probably the most coherent post ever. I agree with everything you stated and wish others would see it as you, seriously. The one and only thing I do disagree with however is that we can't change management. This has been my major beef from day one here. We, the shareholders, can change management if we want to. Everyone forgets that Whit works for US. He runs ITRO like it's his baby but it is not. If enough shareholders raise hell and biatch when they should then the BOD and Whit will take notice. That's the way it works. They must listen if there is enough shareholders raising hell. The problem here is 98% of you guys want to squelch the 2% that want change instead of jumping onboard. This is how it's been for many many many years. You guys have done a dis-service to yourselves and don't even realize it. I tried to get involved and get others involved in speaking up (constructively) for change but it backfired. Now I'm fed up beyond belief because this all could have been avoided if enough shareholders just said wait a second, Whit, we don't like the way this is going and we think you need to do a better job. Would that have been so hard? People were more worried about the negative fallout that would have than to send a clear message to Whit. Now we all have to take the medicine and it's NASTY.
Then when the new stock goes under $1 then I bet others will start waking up and raising hell. But by that time it will be too late. I blame the 98% afraid to speak up but most of all I blame myself for staying in this turd for so long. I recognized the problems many years ago but figured it would all change but it clearly hasn't and won't without the shareholders forcing change.
WHIT NEEDS TO STEP DOWN AS CEO! It's still salvagable but he needs to go!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
