Replies to post #26661 on BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[Gold Seeker]

Gaboy, your post is just not based in reality. I don't think anyone wants your shares and I certainly do not want yours or anyone else's shares.

All I want for this stock is for the investors to be presented with a fair presentation of the potential of the company. You can keep your shares until you paper your bathroom, I don't care. What I don't like is for the company to tell investors they are going to sell tests in China when just a meager amount of research tells you that sales in China without registration is impossible unless you want someone fined or put in jail. So, the question to as is not of me, it is to management as to why they told you they could do something that was not possible.

Why is there a sham corporation in Denver to sell Dog RECAF?

Gaboy, how many things have now been the "fast track to profits"?

Has management ever presented you with a true picture of the company? At one time, I too felt the company had potential and my posts reflected that view. When Abbott bailed, I had to totally review the potential of the company ignoring anything Moro said. Once you ignore anything stated by management, there is zero evidence to support any value for a universal cancer marker. That is when I sold my shares and my posts now reflect that position.

Gaboy, I am totally honest with my posting. You claim something totally false on my quote from the Vet you mentioned. He mentioned that the test should not be used for screening. That was my whole point of the post. I totally disagree with Moro on screening. Moro is advocating screening even when the number of false positive are huge.

The Vet I quoted also happened to say that it could be used for monitoring. I too agree that monitoring is a possible use for RECAF but I just don't think doctors nor vets will actually use the product. DR70 has been FDA approved for monitoring colon cancer for two years and doctors are not using the product. Vets are just like doctors. They are not dummies and their reaction for using a universal cancer marker for monitoring will be the same as human doctors.