"All the NASD did was add a zero..." and also erroneously include SCMI on the Reg. SHO list for four days. Many, including consultants, would draw from such 4-day actions reasonable conclusions concerning the validity/appropriateness of SCMI's presence on that list -- if such consultants were in fact even involved in studying and/or providing advice on this particular listing aspect of the Reg. SHO process.
Say what you want from here. I'm done with this one. In my view, you have no point to make...
There are plenty of valid points, however, concerning faulty execution from SCMI -- or even constructive suggestions to offer. If you look back over the posts today, you will see several examples. Perhaps you should try such an approach in a future post of your own -- as a refreshing change of pace, both for your own benefit and also for the benefit of this board.
I leave you with that. You can have the last word, if you would like. I ask you, please, to consider expressing it calmly, though, perhaps even respectfully. I think all on the board would welcome such a change of pace.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
