InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

losmashrt

06/18/10 3:30 PM

#216257 RE: Poptech #216256

Pop, would you agree that this company's revenue may have been better if YA hadn't intentionally cut funding to an amount sufficient only to keep the doors open and the dilution scheme going? Say enough money to do some marketing and building of the brand, funds with less onerous terms. Back to what I said, YA's blame. YA's own description of their financing is "attack financing". I don't know what that means, but I don't like the sound of it. Los
icon url

nicehit

06/18/10 11:06 PM

#216269 RE: Poptech #216256

POP...

"fault of management or simply poor industry adoption interest."

I would say 30% Management 70% Adoption.

How many CEO's we had. None have planed for when the market was read for our technology. What did we do sell paint for cars to try to bring in Rev's. What a joke.

Gravitec should have held us over but that seemed to be mismanaged also.

To re-think about it, I blame management 100% for not anticipating industry adoption and not thinking about other ideas to bring in rev's until the market was ready for us.

I guess it's easier to move paper then to actually work for a living.