Replies to post #19339 on Encounter Development Technologies Inc. (ENTI)

[slazenger7]

I am perfectly relaxed. I am just getting a little weary with all the Monday morning quarterbacks out there who immediately start preaching about what the company "should have, could have, would have, might have, done" after the fact, who really don't understand how tremendously difficult it is to be even close to perfect on time frames on the Pink Sheets or anywhere else for that matter. Peeps will then say that the company shouldn't give time lines if they are not 1000% sure they can meet every one exactly as proposed. However, these same peeps would then be screaming and complaining that the company is not being "transparent" enough or is too vague in its projections and is keeping shareholders in the dark by not letting them know specifically what the company is going to do and when they are going to do it, if the company doesn't give projected time lines for completing each step of their business plans.

In other words, in many cases the company is damned if they do and damned if they don't.

[EnixStorm]

I realize you're for ENTI too which is good, but I have to disagree with your belief on our being misled... I really don't think anyone was misled at all. If you put that much merit into the PRs basically pointing to a fully functional website, you misconstrued and overshot to the left a few ticks. You have to take these things with an ounce of skepticism and also read the technicalities in the words that were wrote. If I said the site will launch on June 1st, then expect a basic website up. If I said a fully functional glitch free site will launch, the have at me if there's a typo on the page or a link doesn't work because I didn't deliver. The PRs placed are looked over fairly well and by using words like should or may, basically entails that there is some sort of grey area or leeway to the left and right to work with incase it doesn't go as planned...